Categories
Uncategorized

Prompts for February 22

Chapter 19

p. 397. Martinet’s profession was that of a civil law notary. What did that entail?

p. 398 Bystander’s position about the Separate Car Act was: “the law was a great insult to colored people,” mirroring Martinet’s position. Is that why Martinet suggested Bystander as the lawyer to test its constitutionality in federal courts?

p. 399-400 Why did Emma’s attorney suggested she swallowed hard and did nothing?

p. 401 What did Bystander mean by: “The negro, as a citizen, is a creation of the Republican party?” How do you feel about this assessment today?

p. 402-406 What is your impression about the new Justice Brown? Does it bring to mind and Yale-trained S.Ct. Justices on the the bench today?

p. 406-7 What can you say about the tyranny of separation and Martinet’s work in this area?

p. 408-09. What is your interpretation of the Bystander’s words “it was given freedom it must conquer liberty?” and Luxenberg’s “Silence was the servant of oppression?”

p. 410-12 What did Bystander mean with “rights are enforced and protected by the courts?”

p. 413. Martinet described the Southern whites as full of surprises in terms of inborn, ingrained, hypocrisy and treachery. Could it be that Luxenberg wants to single out one of the main characters of his book with these words?

p. 414-15 How do the Browns and the Tourgees spend the summer of 1891?

p. 416-17 How does Luxenberg explain that Louisville & Nashville “wouldn’t mind seeing separate car laws disappear?”

Categories
Uncategorized

Discussion Prompts 2/15

Chapter 18. The Negro Quuestion

p. 373-380 How did Tourgée (as Bystander) end up writing for the Inter Ocean “the Negro Question”?

p. 381-82 What happened to HP Brown pursuit for a U.S. S. Ct. seat?

p. 383-84 How did Tourgée describe Southernism?

p. 384-86 What was Decuir (1878) about?

p. 386-388 What was Mississippi (1890) about?

p. 389. In what context did Tourgée say: “If the Nation is not willing to do justice to the colored man, […] let it at least refrain from doing further injustice?

p. 390-92 Who was the metaphorical patient and doctor at the Mohonk Conference on the Negro Question?

p. 393-94 What did Luisiana do regarding the railroad mandates? What did Martinet do?

NYCCH_12_medium.jpg
Martinet to Tourgée

Categories
Uncategorized

Prompts for Tuesday 2/8

Chapter 17 – The Color Line Sharpens (1883-1888)

p. 351-352 What is the symbolism of Chief Justice Taney’s wooden inkstand?

p. 353 In the Civil Rights Cases Justice Bradley discussed the “badge of slavery”:

Page 109 U. S. 24

The long existence of African slavery in this country gave us very distinct notions of what it was and what were its necessary incidents. Compulsory service of the slave for the benefit of the master, restraint of his movements except by the master’s will, disability to hold property, to make contracts, to have a standing in court, to be a witness against a white person, and such like burdens and incapacities were the inseparable incidents of the institution. Severer punishments for crimes were imposed on the slave than on free persons guilty of the same offences. Congress, as we have seen, by the Civil Rights Bill of 1866, passed in view of the Thirteenth Amendment before the Fourteenth was adopted, undertook to wipe out these burdens and disabilities, the necessary incidents of slavery constituting its substance and visible form, and to secure to all citizens of every race and color, and without regard to previous servitude, those fundamental rights which are the essence of civil freedom, namely, the same right to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, give evidence, and to inherit, purchase, lease, sell and convey property as is enjoyed by white citizens. Whether this legislation was fully authorized by the Thirteenth Amendment alone, without the support which it afterward received from the Fourteenth Amendment, after the adoption of which it was reenacted with some additions, it is not necessary to inquire. It is referred to for the purpose of showing that, at that time (in 1866), Congress did not assume, under the authority given by the Thirteenth Amendment, to adjust what may be called the social rights of men and races in the community, but only to declare and vindicate those fundamental rights which appertain to the essence of citizenship, and the enjoyment or deprivation of which constitutes the essential distinction between freedom and slavery.

Page 109 U. S. 23

p. 354 In his dissent Harlan explains the meaning of freedom – the same rights as the white population has enjoyed; and not as an empty vessel.

“It is not the words of the law, but the internal sense of it that makes the law; the letter of the law is the body; the sense and reason of the law is the soul.”

p. 355-56 Any Pennsylvanian remarks to Harlan’s dissent?

p. 357. What was Douglas’ essay “Civil Rights and Justice Harlan” about?

p. 358-363 What was the role of the National Convention of Colored Men? Who was Louis Martinet? How do you feel reading Douglas’ words “the color line is not the creation of colored people” in light of ignorant statements by famous people today, such as Whoopy Goldberg’s “I know race – I can see it” (not real quote)

p. 364 What is the educational role of Louisiana Standard as explained by the author?

p. 365-371 What is the saga of Councill and the Interstate Commerce Commission?

Categories
Uncategorized

Prompts for 2/1

pp. 329-333 What is A Fool’s Errand about?

pp. 334-36 What was Albion’s advice to President Garfield? What did he see as important as freedom and justice?

pp. 338-9. What did Albion mean by “Beware the Hayes fallacy.”

p. 340-1 The North had reaped immense profits from slave labor, Albion said. How do you feel about that statement? What can you say in favor or against that statement?

p. 342-44. What was the Jubilee Singers’ experience on tour?

p. 344-9. How did Justice Harlan become the only hope of the colored men of the nation?